Contraception? One View

By Robert Pate

This is one of four views of contraception written by Bible college professors. Other views are written by Phil KennesonJack Cottrell, and Mark Weedman.

There are a number of issues to consider when discussing contraception. These include biological infertility, the mother’s health, financial stewardship, God’s will, adoption, sex for pleasure vs. procreation, masturbation, abstinence, relationship status, and ministry opportunities, to name a few. Before jumping in, I should note that when using the term contraception I am referring to all methods of preventing conception and pregnancy, such as condoms, intrauterine devices, hormone-based oral contraceptives, coitus interruptus, etc. I do not include elective abortion in this same category.

First and foremost, we must consider Scripture. In several places, biblical authors address issues of sexuality, procreation, and infertility, but no biblical text specifically prohibits the use of contraceptives. So in keeping with the Restoration Movement tradition, “Where the Bible speaks we speak, and where it is silent we are silent” (a reference to, among other passages, 1 Corinthians 4:6), it may be best not to derive a specific mandate regarding contraception.

01_Birth-control3_JNOne passage regularly examined when discussing birth control is Genesis 38:8-10. In this account, Judah instructs his son, Onan, to fulfill the duty of providing children to Onan’s deceased brother’s widow. This practice of yibbum, or more specifically in this case, levirate marriage, was an arrangement entered into by choice by both parties. This practice was meant to provide protection to a childless woman who could marry her brother-in-law to receive security and a continued family lineage for her deceased spouse. The brother-in-law-turned-husband of the widow then became the sole benefactor of his deceased brother’s estate.

In the Genesis 38 narrative, Onan follows through with the marriage and agrees to the obligation to attempt to provide heirs for his brother, rather than choosing to pursue a less-favorably viewed halizah, in which the brother declines the new marriage arrangement (and sole rights to the inheritance). However, not wanting his new wife to bear children who would not be considered his own, he used the oldest known method of contraception, withdrawal. When he “spilled his semen on the ground,” Onan behaved wickedly in the eyes of God and was subsequently killed by God.

Many have argued that this is reason enough not to use contraceptives. Some interpret the text as indicating that all sexual acts should end with the possibility of conception. There are several problems with this, many of which are related to the issues mentioned above. Are infertile couples sinning when they have intercourse because there is no chance for conception (save for a miraculous pregnancy)? What about missionary couples who either live in environments hostile to children or serve in ministries that would suffer greatly if they spent several hours a day caring for their children rather than focusing on their work on the field? Is it altering God’s will to deprive him of the opportunity to knit together a new child in a mother’s womb?

These are certainly important issues to consider. Ultimately, however, we should refer back to the biblical text to determine the problem with Onan’s behavior. In short, Onan behaved selfishly. He accepted his brother’s estate and sought sexual pleasure from his new bride without providing her an opportunity to become pregnant and further her first husband’s lineage. Onan also would have been obligated to share his brother’s inheritance with any children he produced. Onan broke the terms of the yibbum, and this brought on the anger and wrath of God. It was Onan’s selfishness and dishonesty, not the “contraceptive” behavior, which was seen as sinful in God’s eyes.

Fruitful and Multiply

For those concerned with the Genesis instruction to be fruitful and multiply, I would urge consideration of the context in which God gave that command to history’s original couple. It was early in the history of humanity and, since then, we have done quite a thorough job of filling the earth with people to enjoy our inheritance from God. Looking at the New Testament, we see that Jesus neither married nor had children, yet he lived a life without sin. The apostle Paul specifically stated it is preferable, for those who are able, to remain single (and thus childless) so that one may better serve God without the distractions of sexuality and children.

So what are we to conclude? With no explicit biblical commands about birth control, perhaps it is wise to consider Paul’s recommendation that couples “do not deprive each other [of sexual relations] except perhaps by mutual consent,” and then only for a limited time that the couple may focus on their relationships with God (1 Corinthians 7:5).

In addition to Scripture, Kenneth Samples of Reasons to Believe (www.reasons.org) directs couples to consider the following authority sources before making a difficult faith-related decision: prayer, reason/logic, conscience, church tradition, and whether the action to be taken reflects love. In the absence of direct biblical advice, any theology of contraception should include all of these elements and reflect a thoughtful, prayerful, and personal decision.

Robert Pate is a clinical psychologist and serves as associate professor of psychology and counseling with Hope International University, Fullerton, California. 

You Might Also Like

Small Churches: Responding to Some Stereotypes

Small Churches: Responding to Some Stereotypes

1 Comment

  1. Mrs. C
    February 4, 2016 at 4:39 pm

    “First and foremost, we must consider Scripture.” Come then, let us reason together.

    Professor Pate says that “no biblical text specifically prohibits the use of contraceptives.” This is true.
    It is also true that no Biblical text specifically allows, promotes or commands the use of contraceptives.

    How do we know the Trinity exists and about its nature? No Biblical text specifically names it or defines it.

    What the Biblical text does specifically say is: “Be fruitful and increase in number: fill the earth and subdue it.” (Genesis 1:28) “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the earth.” (Genesis 9:1) “Be fruitful and increase in number; multiply on the earth and increase upon it.” (Genesis 9:7) The Bible speaks, many refuse to listen.

    Malachi 2:16 reads, “‘I have divorce,’ says the Lord God of Israel.” Yet in Matthew 19:8 we find Jesus stating, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard.” There is no Biblical text altering God’s command to “Be fruitful and increase in number.”

    “First and foremost, we must consider Scripture.”

    “See now that I myself am He! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand.” Deuteronomy 32:39

    “The Lord brings death and makes alive; he brings down to the grave and raises up.” 1 Samuel 2:6

    “For just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, even so the Son gives life to whom he is pleased to give it.” John 5:21

    “The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else.” Acts 17:24-25

    “As it is written: ‘I have made you [Abraham] a father of many nations.’ He is our father in the sight of God, in whom he believed- the God who gives life to the dead and calls things that are not as though they were.” Romans 4:17

    Could it be that, “you are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God?” (Matthew 22:29)

    Consider this story about a 10 year old Corrie Ten Boom and her daddy. “Father, what is sexism?” He turned to look at me, as he always did when answering a question, but to my surprise he said nothing. At last he stood up, lifted his traveling case from the rack over our heads, and set it on the floor. “Will you carry it off the train, Corrie?” he said. “It’s too heavy,” I said. “Yes,” he said. “And it would be a pretty poor father who would ask his little girl to carry such a load. It’s the same way, Corrie, with knowledge. Some knowledge is too heavy for children. When you are older and stronger you can bear it. For now you must trust me to carry it for you.” And I was satisfied. More than satisfied – wonderfully at peace. There were answers to this and all my hard questions. For now I was content to leave them in my father’s keeping.”

    “You do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes…You ought to say, ‘if it is the Lord’s will, we will live and do this or that.’ As it is, you boast and brag. All such boasting is evil. Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn’t do it, sins.” (James 4:15-17)

    “Without weakening in his faith, he [Abraham] faced the fact that his body was as good as dead- since he was about a hundred years old- and that Sarah’s womb was also dead. Yet he did not waver through unbelief regarding the promise of God, but was strengthened in his faith and gave glory to God, being fully persuaded that God had power to do what he had promised. This is why ‘it was credited to him as righteousness.’ The words ‘it was credited to him’ were written not for him alone, but also for us, to whom God will credit righteousness- for us who believe in him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead.” (Romans 4:19-24)

    “First and foremost, we must consider Scripture.” Amen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe for Free!

Subscribe to gain free access to all of our digital content,
including our new digital magazine,
and we'll let you know when new digital issues are ready to view!