By Kent E. Fillinger
When I started conducting megachurch
and emerging megachurch research 15 years ago, there were a total of 255,179
people attending these churches on a given weekend. That number has grown 52
percent to 388,243 in 2018, which is a cause for celebration!
For me, this statistical
journey has always been about sharing and celebrating how God is at work in
churches of all sizes in many different ways. My focus continues to be on helping
churches learn from one another and providing context and clear metrics for
church leaders to make better decisions based on research facts and findings.
This is the first of a three-part series. This article and accompanying charts focus on the 55 megachurches (average weekly worship attendance of 2,000 or more) and 70 emerging megachurches (averaging 1,000 to 1,999 weekly) that completed our annual church survey. In August, Iâ™ll report on large churches (those averaging 500 to 999) and medium churches (250 to 499), and in October, Iâ™ll look at small (100 to 249) and very small churches (99 or fewer) to see what we can learn and celebrate.
Are
These Churches Still Growing?
Megachurches had the best
growth rate in more than a decade in 2018. The average megachurch grew 6.6
percent, up from 5.7 percent in 2017. The emerging megachurches maintained a
solid average growth rate of 4.1 percent last year.
Overall, almost three-fourths
of the megachurches (74 percent) grew last year. The average growth rate for
these 40 growing megachurches was 11 percent. By comparison, the megachurches
that declined in attendance last year shrank an average of 6 percent.
Among emerging megachurches, 71
percent grew in 2018. This was a healthy increase from the prior year, when
only 57 percent grew. Last year marked the largest percentage of growing
emerging megachurches since 2011, when 77 percent grew.
The emerging megachurches that
grew last year added 8.3 percent. The emerging megachurches that didnâ™t grow
last year declined by an average of 6 percent (the same percentage as
megachurches that declined in attendance).
What
About Baptisms?
The baptism ratioâthe number
of people baptized per 100 people in average attendanceâis on a multiyear slide
for both megachurches and emerging megachurches.
In 2013, the average
megachurch had a baptism ratio of 8.2, but last year it was 6.7. This may not
seem like a big drop, but it equates to about 80 fewer baptisms per megachurch
in 2018, or 4,416 fewer baptisms among the 55 megachurches than just five years
ago.
Likewise, the baptism ratio in
emerging megachurches has dropped from 7.1 in 2015 to 5.8 last year. This means
about 1,212 fewer people were baptized by the 70 emerging megachurches in 2018
than just three years prior.
Again this year, we studied a
churchâ™s finances in relation to its size and number of baptisms.
Emerging megachurches spent 34
percent more per baptism last year than the average megachurch. Dividing
average general fund giving by the average number of baptisms showed that
emerging megachurches spent $29,653 per baptism last year compared with $22,160
for megachurches.
Not surprisingly, growing
churches baptize more people than declining churches. The average growing
megachurch baptized 7.2 people per 100 in average attendance in 2018; for
megachurches that declined in attendance, the ratio was 5.4.
Meanwhile, growing emerging
megachurches baptized 6.2 people per 100 in average attendance, compared with
4.7 baptisms per 100 for shrinking emerging megachurches.
What
Impact Does a Lead Ministerâ™s Age and Tenure Have on Church Growth and Baptisms?
In these reports, Iâ™ve noted
several times a possible relationship between a lead ministerâ™s age and tenure
and his churchâ™s growth rates and baptism ratios. (Ministers often tell me this
is the part of the report they like the least. My standard response: Iâ™m just
reporting the news, not creating it, and I wish the findings were different.) Over
a 15-year span, the numbers seem to indicate the older the minister and the
longer the tenure, the lower the growth rates and baptism ratios.
In 2018, 53 percent of
megachurch lead ministers were age 55 or older, and among all megachurches, the
average age of lead ministers was 53. In 2009, the average megachurch lead
minister was 49.7 years old.
Having noted all of that, this
next statistic was unanticipated: Megachurches with lead ministers who were 55
to 59 years old in 2018 grew 13.5 percent, the fastest growth rate of any age
category. (It would be wonderful to see these ministers sustain that growth,
should they remain where they are over the next several years.) By comparison,
megachurches with lead ministers age 60 and older grew less than 1 percent last
year.
Megachurches with lead
ministers ages 45 to 49 grew 11 percent, making it the second-fastest-growing
age category. (This grouping typically leads the way in growth.)
Among emerging megachurch lead
ministers, only 37 percent were age 55 or older last year. The average age of
an emerging megachurch lead minister was 50.8, which has held steady for three
years.
In terms of growth, younger
ministers led the way among emerging megachurches. Churches with lead ministers
ages 35 to 39 grew the fastest, followed closely by churches with ministers ages
40 to 44 (growing 10 percent and 9 percent, respectively). Emerging
megachurches led by ministers ages 55 to 59 grew 5.5 percent in 2018, while
churches led by ministers age 60 and older saw a decline in attendance, the
only category to experience a decrease.
Baptism-ratio results were
similar. Megachurches with the best baptism ratios were led by ministers ages
40 to 44, followed closely by churches led by ministers ages 55 to 59 (7.7 and
7.0, respectively). Emerging megachurches with the highest baptism ratios were led
by ministers in these two categories: ages 45 to 49 (6.7 baptism per 100 in
average attendance) and ages 35 to 39 (6.2).
Are
Attendances for Christmas and Easter Trading Places?
When I began collecting
research data, church attendance at Easter was consistently much larger than for
Christmas Eve. I even wrote a short article in April 2011 to emphasize the
importance of planning well for Easter because of its attendance edge over
Christmas Eve. But a shift seems to be taking place among megachurches . . .
the gap is closing.
In 2011, megachurches had 16
percent more people attend Easter services than Christmas Eve services (average
attendance for each was 8,048 and 6,927, respectively). But in 2018, Easter attendance
edged out Christmas Eve attendance by only 1.4 percent.
In 2018, Christmas Eve fell on
Monday, which likely was a factor in the gap closing last year. Another possible
contributor was that 62 percent of megachurches offered identical Christmas-focused
services throughout the weekend and on Christmas Eve. (Among emerging
megachurches, only 33 percent did the same.) Two-thirds of the emerging
megachurches had weekend services that were different from their stand-alone
Christmas Eve services.
Christmas Eve average
attendance at megachurches increased 49 percent from 2011 to 2018. By
comparison, the average Easter attendance at megachurches increased only 30
percent over the same period.
Emerging megachurches have
seen a similar attendance pattern. Average attendance for Christmas Eve jumped
20 percent at emerging megachurches, while Easter attendance hasnâ™t increased
at all over the same seven-year span.
Average attendance at
megachurches on both Easter and Christmas weekends was almost double that of a
normal weekend; the attendance bump was 94 percent and 92 percent, respectively,
in 2018. Emerging megachurch attendance was 69 percent larger on Easter and 49
percent larger on Christmas Eve, compared with typical weekends in 2018.
Which
Discipleship Method Do Most Churches Use?
Discipleship, evangelism, and
numerical growth continue to be stated priorities for most of the megachurches
and emerging megachurches in our study. âMaking disciples who make disciplesâ
has become a primary mantra for many of these churches. But figuring out how to
turn from a knowledge-based discipleship focus to a more obedience-based model
of discipleship that reproduces itself into a movement hasnâ™t proven easy in
most churches.
The primary methods churches
have used for adult discipleship training or spiritual growth development are
classes and small groups, or a combination of both. The shift toward small groups
over classes has been gradual over the last few years, but still is notable.
In 2015, 64 percent of
emerging megachurches used a combination of classes and groups; only 33 percent
used small groups only. Last year, 52 percent of emerging megachurches used a
combination of classes and groups, and 45 percent of emerging megachurches used
small groups only. A very small number of emerging megachurches (3 percent)
have continued to offer only classes (and no small groups).
In megachurches, small groups only
(53 percent) have the edge over a combination of classes and groups (47
percent) over that same time period. No megachurch in our report uses only classes
for discipleship.
Among both megachurches and
emerging megachurches, the average growth rates and baptism ratios were much
better for those using small groups only rather than a combination of classes
and groups.
For example, megachurches with
only small groups grew an average of 9.5 percent last year, compared with
megachurches that offered a combination of classes and groups (3.6 percent).
Likewise, megachurches using only small groups baptized an average of 7.6
people per 100 people in average attendance, compared with only 5.6 baptisms
for megachurches offering both classes and groups. The results were the same among
emerging megachurches.
This is just the tip of the
iceberg in terms of information gathered from this yearâ™s survey. In addition
to future special reports on large and medium churches and small and very small
churches, watch for more niche-focused articles exploring new topics in my
monthly âMetricsâ column.
Kent E. Fillinger serves as president of
3:STRANDS Consulting, Indianapolis, Indiana, and regional vice president (Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Michigan) with Christian Financial Resources.
0 Comments