Understanding the Wrath and Grace of God
Godโs wrath is not an embarrassing contradiction of his goodness but an expression of his holiness, justice, and righteousness. This article considers how a biblical understanding of divine wrath deepens the meaning of grace, salvation, the cross, and Christian worship.
- Godโs wrath reflects his moral goodness and righteous judgment against evil.
- Grace becomes more remarkable when understood alongside the seriousness of sin and divine judgment.
- Christian worship can acknowledge both the fearful justice of God and the joyful grace revealed in Christ.
By Tom Lawson
The first hymn in Alexander Campbellโs 1834 hymnal lifts up these words of praise:
Before Jehovahโs awful1 throne,
Ye nations, bow with sacred joy;
Know that the Lord is God alone;
He can create, and He destroy.
This image of an all-powerful God, who can both create and destroy, calling the nations before him, is given scant attention in worship these days. For the theologically liberal, talk of God standing in judgment of the world is a source of frank embarrassment. For theological conservatives, however, the concept is also quietly avoided as a focus of worship. Descriptions of an angry God bringing judgment upon the wicked just do not fit well into upbeat celebrative worship.
One result of this avoidance is a popular view of God that is biblically distorted. The New Testament church, however, did not flinch at the notion of the wrath of God. It was, in fact, woven into worship and reflected in a passionate desire for the appearing of Christ at the end of the age.
The Necessity of Godโs Wrath
The wrath of God ought not to be a source of awkward embarrassment. It is inherent in the very nature of God. As such, the justice of God should be included in the focus of our worship from time to time. One source of our discomfort comes from a very narrow definition of wrath. We often fail to recognize that anger, in some contexts, is a direct result of morality.
The king was enraged. He sent his army and destroyed those murderers and burned their city (Matthew 22:7).
There are certainly times, perhaps most of the time, when our anger is prompted by resentment, irritation, or some perceived personal affront. We get a speeding ticket for going 3 mph over the speed limit. Or, after weโve waited in line 20 minutes, the girl at the register decides to take her break just as we start unloading our shopping cart. Sadly, this kind of anger, petty and retaliatory, is all too common. We are correct in not wishing to ascribe it to God.
The wrath of God is more akin to what we feel when we come upon a child being cruelly beaten by schoolyard bullies. It is anger that is virtually demanded by basic morality and justice. Anyone who watched in horror last year as more than 300 people, most of them children, were killed by terrorists at a school in the southern Russian town of Beslan, understands the link between ethics and anger. In such circumstances, the absence of outrage would be the mark of moral deficiency.
God is a righteous judge, a God who expresses his wrath every day (Psalm 7:11).
The ancient church, in an even higher sense, held a similar understanding of the wrath directed by God toward the rebellious wicked. Godโs wrath is an expression of his goodness, holiness, and righteousness. How could it not, then, be worthy of praise? Could any Christian long for the grand rebellion of humankind against him to continue indefinitely? The ultimate victory over sin and Satan is grounded in the wrath of God.
After these things I heard something like a loud voice of a great multitude in heaven, saying, โHallelujah! Salvation and glory and power belong to our God; because His judgments are true and righteous; for He has judged the great harlot who was corrupting the earth with her immorality, and He has avenged the blood of His bond-servants on her.โ And a second time they said, โHallelujah! Her smoke rises up forever and everโ (Revelation 19:1-3, New American Standard Version).
The Paradox of Wrath and Grace
One by-product of downplaying the wrath of God is a significant distortion of the message of salvation. If God is not really that angry, then grace is surely not that unexpected. We move from John Newtonโs โamazingโ grace to โoh-thatโs-niceโ grace. When the primary focus of the offer of salvation is no longer the removing of our guilt before a justly wrathful judge, then secondary aspects must be elevated. Promises of happiness, inner peace, financial blessings, spiritual power, and a general esprit de corps of the congregation become the central tools of persuasion. People are won by the church instead of being won by the message of the cross and added to the church.
The love of God, we are told frequently, is beyond our ability to understand or measure. As much as this is true, it is just as true that Godโs anger is beyond our ability to understand or measure. There is no anger in all creation that is the equal of his anger. Hell, after all, is Godโs idea. It is God, not the devil, who holds the power to cast body and soul into Hell (Matthew 10:28). It is at the juxtaposition of these two facets, both the love and wrath of God the Almighty, that we find the cross of Christ.
Ask someone what they know about 18th-century New England preacher Jonathan Edwards. Most will mention only his sermon, โSinners in the Hands of an Angry God.โ Oddly, if you had asked a person from that era what Edwards was best known for, it would have been his many sermons on the love of God. Sweeping national revivals, such as the Great Awakening of Edwardsโs generation, came on the heels of preaching both Godโs wrath and Godโs grace.
Preaching wrath without a biblical understanding of grace leads only to despair and narrow legalism. Preaching grace, however, without a biblical understanding of wrath leads to Christianity robbed of both its threat and its thrill. We end up with a religion of โbe-niceโ ethics and โfeel-goodโ churches.
I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With







