This Week”s Decisions about How I”ll Use the Internet

September 2, 2014

Mark A. Taylor

By Mark A. Taylor

Among the many (too many!) Internet posts I”ve skimmed in the last week, a few have led me to some decisions about my own behavior on the worried World Wide Web. The Internet is good for much; I”m not saying we should learn to live without it. But I”m concerned about the way we Christians sometimes decide to use it.

What I”ve decided:

1. We can”t relate to each other via the Internet alone. If my opinion about another Christian isn”t based on an out-of-web relationship, then I”ll think twice about discussing him or her on the web, especially if my post would be a critique. I”m guessing a second thought will usually lead me to avoid such posts altogether.

Sept2_MT_JN2. If I have something intimate or disturbing to share about myself, I won”t be posting it on the Internet. I”ll tell my family and close friends. I may even e-mail the news to a long list of associates who care and need to know. But I won”t be putting it out there for anyone who knows my name to read, share, discuss, and criticize.

3. If I decide to renege on the above decision, I won”t be surprised by rejection from those who don”t know me; I won”t be hurt by rebuke from those who don”t understand my situation.

More people skim the Internet than use it for careful research about a situation that baffles them. I”d expect those close to me to do that work. I wouldn”t assume that the casual web browser would invest the same energy.

4. But, as a casual web browser myself, I”m going to exercise some restraint. When I read something about another Christian that angers or frightens or confuses me, I”ll write him or her directly. Or give him a call. If I don”t know the person well enough to contact him or her directly, what right do I have to write about him, by name, on Facebook?

You can make a case, I guess, for saying that a person who “goes public” should expect public reaction. (This is why I don”t intend to seek celebrity status with revelations about myself.) But when the person is a Christian brother, we owe him a careful response and a concerned inquiry.

Even if his action is a blatant sin, we”re to “restore that person gently” with care to keep ourselves from sinning in the process (Galatians 6:1).

I”ve seen too much sin on the Internet lately. And it comes from the keystrokes of Christians who believe their Internet access gives them the right to make personal attacks.

I intend to work at avoiding the same error.

Mark A. Taylor
Author: Mark A. Taylor

Mark A. Taylor, who served as Christian Standard editor from 2003 to 2017, retired in June 2017 after almost 41 years with Standard Publishing (Christian Standard Media).

Sponsored

intentional churches unleash workshops

Sponsored

Ozark Christian College Christian Standard 1200x1533

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marshall Hayden
11 years ago

Excellent!

John Murphy
11 years ago

Mark, I appreciate your comments, but at the same time see them as inappropriate to the current situation. It’s not just a brother struggling with sin. Lord knows we are all dealing with sin in our lives. But one must never embrace the sin, or celebrate the sin. That as I see it was the far greater offense.

Ron Lewis
11 years ago

Well said Mark, well said.

Dennis Bratton
11 years ago

Mark, as always, a thoughtful article. The phrase that puzzled me begins, “Even if his action is a blatant sin…”, the call is for gentle restoration. If it truly reaches the level of blatant sin, does it not also call for straight forward, honest response or even rebuttal? Blatant sin indicates a public, personal declaration to ignore a biblical value in favor of a situational ethic. A candid discussion will most likely be personal in that circumstance. Once a public choice is made to blatantly embrace and present as acceptable a controversial position, isn’t it unfair to dismiss contrary opinions as nothing more than personal attacks or sin against a brother? Certainly there should be civility along with candor and clarity in any pursuit of truth.

Guthrie Veech
11 years ago

Excellent thoughts

11 years ago

Excellent advice. Perhaps, like the old sermon illustration suggests for the preacher who kept preaching the same sermon, you should keep publishing this until some change occurs.

11 years ago

Excellent advice. Thank you. Needs to be shared and repeated.

Buddy Harris
11 years ago

“we owe him a careful response and a concerned inquiry” I think we owe this to everyone — not just a Christian brother!

Help Keep Christian Standard Free & Accessible with a Tax Deductible Donation

We can do more together!

Every gift makes a difference!

No, thank you.
100% secure transactions - receipts provided.
Does Your Church Want to Support Christian Standard?

Would your church consider including support for Christian Standard in its annual missions budget? Your support would help us not only continue the 160-year legacy of this unifying ministry, but also expand the free resources, cooperative opportunities, and practical guidance we provide to strengthen churches in the U.S. and around the world.

We can do more together!

Every gift makes a difference!

No, thank you.
100% secure transactions - receipts provided.
Secret Link
8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x