Who is More Religious, the Left or the Right?

October 30, 2024

Christian Standard

The problem with political religion should be obvious. Politicians make big promises but are bad saviors. Political parties make fanatical communities but bad churches. When politics become religion, Christian unity is poisoned and our more meaningful relationships die.

By Tyler McKenzie

I heard it said recently that we are living through a revival of fundamentalist religion, but the revival is among nonreligious political groups. A revival of religion among the nonreligious. I agree. In our modern efforts to get rid of God and secularize in the USA, we had to find somewhere else to go for leadership, morality, hope, and meaning. We had to find something transcendent that could bring people together. So, politics took on a new religious fervor. Politicians are now our messiahs. Media personalities are our prophets. Political parties are our churches. Political platforms are our gospels. 

Christianity hasnโ€™t totally disappeared. Instead, politicians use it: (1) to lure Christians in, (2) baptize their pre-existing party beliefs, and (3) create a sanctimonious sense that โ€œIโ€™m on Godโ€™s side!โ€ For example, earlier this year President Trump endorsed the Lee Greenwood โ€œGod Bless the USAโ€ patriotic Bible. It was sold for $59.99. Inside this Bible, it includes copies of the Declaration of Independence, the Pledge of Allegiance, and other historic documents. INSIDE THE BIBLE! Right next to Genesis, the Psalms, Paulโ€™s letters, and Jesusโ€™ Sermon on the Mount! To be clear, โ€œIโ€™m proud to be an American,โ€ but Iโ€™m prouder to be a Christian. I find it concerning that a kingdom of this world would put their constitutions or declarations inside the Bible. We should be irritable when people add stuff to our sacred book. This is the inspired Word. When people elevate writings of men even close to this level, we ought to call it out and protect the integrity of our faith. Donโ€™t you see whatโ€™s going on here? This is political religion. They are using a perversion of the Bible (1) to lure you in, (2) baptize their pre-existing beliefs, and (3) create a sanctimonious sense that โ€œWe are on Godโ€™s side!โ€ 

The left is just as guilty of political religion, they just donโ€™t pander to evangelicals. In an Atlantic article titled, โ€œAmerica Without God,โ€ Muslim journalist Shadi Hamid showed that for 60 years (1937-1998), church membership remained steady in the USA at around 70 percent. Then over the last 20 years, the number doveโ€ฏto below 50 percent. The left celebrated this trend, assuming that less religion would make people more rational in politics. That has not happened. Hamid writes: 

If secularists hoped that declining religiosity would make for more rational politics, drained of faithโ€™s inflaming passions, they are likely disappointed. As Christianityโ€™s hold, in particular, has weakened, ideological intensity and fragmentation have risen. American faith, it turns out, is as fervent as ever; itโ€™s just that what was onceโ€ฏreligiousโ€ฏbelief has now been channeled intoโ€ฏpoliticalโ€ฏbelief. This is what religion without religion looks like. 

Helen Lewis builds on this in a 2020 Atlantic article where she compares protest culture to religion. The article was titled, โ€œHow Social Justice Became a New Religion.โ€ She begins quite cheeky, โ€œQuick question. If someone is yelling โ€˜repentโ€™ at you in the street, are they more likely to be (a) a religious preacher or (b) a left-wing activist?โ€ Itโ€™s interesting how Christians always get pinned with the caricature of the โ€œangry street-preacher downtown with a megaphone telling people they are evil and need to repent.โ€ Ironically, it is more common now to find activists, not preachers, doing this!  

Lewis argues that younger people are the least religious generation today. That is why they are more likely to be involved in protest culture like what weโ€™ve seen this year on college campuses. When you donโ€™t have a church, you must go somewhere to find โ€œcollective effervescence.โ€ This is the sociological term for the emotional electricity people feel from singing, chanting, or worshiping in community. Hamid recalled that after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in September 2020, droves of mourners gathered outside the Supreme Court, kneeling, weeping, and holding โ€œreligious candlesโ€ with an icon of Ginsburg stamped on them. Hamid wrote, it was “as though they were at the Western Wall.โ€ This is a slicing metaphor. Jews pilgrimage to the Western Wall of the Temple to pray, but also to mourn the loss of their holy space to Islam. When Ginsburg died, it was a time of mourning because many on the left knew they were losing the holy space of the Supreme Court. She would soon be replaced by a conservative judge. Do you see? The left is just as guilty of political religion, but instead of stealing our symbols, they mimic our practices.  

The human heart is made to worship, and when we get rid of God, we have to find something else to give our hearts to. Politics beckons us with open arms. We must resist. Swiss theologian Karl Barth, theologizing about the complicity of the German Lutheran Church with Hitler, once said Christians should be an โ€œunreliable allyโ€ to government. This would be faithful to the example we were given by the earliest Christians.  

Jared Stacy, a political ethicist, suggests that the word Christian was first created by Rome as a partisan label. In Ancient Rome, people signaled their political affiliation to a city or a leader in this way. The Augustianoiโ€ฏwere the people of Caesar. The Herodianoi were the people of Herod Antipas. The Pompeiianoi were the citizens of Pompeii. The Christianoi were the people of Christ. Stacy argues this label was originally given to Christians by Rome to โ€œother them.โ€ Christian wasnโ€™t a label invented by the church. It was applied to the church by outsiders, then redeemed by the church later. It wasnโ€™t an identification; it was an accusation.  

โ€œChristianโ€ was a different political party, a party of citizens who worked for civic renewal, built strong families, moved the moral compass of their community, served the poor, nursed the sick, shared their wealth, loved their enemies, prayed for their leaders, and cared for the souls of their neighbors; but also a party who had no King higher than Jesus.  

The problem with political religion should be obvious. Politicians make big promises but are bad saviors. Political parties make fanatical communities but bad churches. When politics become religion, Christian unity is poisoned and our more meaningful relationships die. As I recently heard Curtis Chang say, we must have the mind of Christ rather than the mind of a partisan (see Philippians 2:5 and the hymn that follows). As the election year reaches its boiling point this November and December, may we meditate on this. โ€œWho is more religious โ€“ the Left or the Right?โ€ Iโ€™m not sure. But my concern is that both may be more religious than the โ€œChristians.โ€  

Tyler McKenzie serves as lead pastor at Northeast Christian Church in Louisville, Kentucky.

Christian Standard
Author: Christian Standard

Contact us at **@********************ia.com

Sponsored

RENEW.org Christian Standard Partner

Sponsored

CCL Network Kids Ministry Cohorts

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Loren C Roberts
1 year ago

Well spoken pastor McKenzie. We indeed have become a nation of religious political fanatics.
I donโ€™t find this surprising however it certainly reminds us that Satan is alive and well along with his cunning redundancy. He has used the same tactics since the Eden debacle. Sadly โ€œChristians โ€œ have fallen for his schemes.

I see in Scripture a lot of warnings about following men instead of worshiping God. My feeling is that God is allowing us as a nation to punish ourselves for our collective sins.

Brian Treviรฑo
11 months ago

I think you need to reanalyze the Lee Greenwood/Trump Bible. I am not saying it is not for opticts, but I don’t see it as adding to God’s word. It is God’s word, and then our founding documents that are based in God’s word and Judeo-Christian principles. I do not think they add our founding documents as doctrine or part of Biblical canon at all.

Help Keep Christian Standard Free & Accessible with a Tax Deductible Donation

We can doย more together!

Every gift makes a difference!

No, thank you.
100% secure transactions - receipts provided.
Does Your Church Want to Support Christian Standard?

Would your church consider including support for Christian Standard in its annual missions budget? Your support would help us not only continue the 160-year legacy of this unifying ministry, but also expand the free resources, cooperative opportunities, and practical guidance we provide to strengthen churches in the U.S. and around the world.

We can doย more together!

Every gift makes a difference!

No, thank you.
100% secure transactions - receipts provided.
Secret Link
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x