For 45 years, Christian Standard regularly published a feature called โAn Epistle from Thistle.โ In introducing the feature in 1952, editor Burris Butler described Thistle as โour lighthearted and lightheaded friend [who]ย corresponds with his unweighty friend, Down, on both light and heavy subjects, generally dealing directly or indirectly with religion.โ The writer of the feature, ultimately revealed as Christian minister and educator James G. Van Buren, died in 1997. Hereโs a column from 1990.ย
_ _ _
Seven Multisyllabic Mistakes in Preaching
(An Epistle from Thistle)ย
May 27, 1990; p. 10
Dear Down:
Probably you are familiar with the proclivity people have exhibited across the years for listing various items in โsevens.โ That is, we seem to enjoy considering what are the โseven wonders of the world,โ the โseven longest rivers,โ the โseven highest mountains,โ etc.
The Greeks had a list of their โseven wisest men,โ and the medieval church said a great deal about the โseven deadly sins.โ
Even the Book of Proverbs has lists, not of sevens, as it happens, but of โfour things,โ such as four things โthat are never satisfiedโ (30:15-17); four things โthat are too amazingโ (30:18- 20); four things the โearth trembles underโ (30:21-23); โfour things (that are) small (but) extremely wiseโ (30:24-27); and four things โthat move with stately bearingโ (30:29-31)โall as the New International Version translates this mateยญrial.
Some people (and I confess Iโm one of them) sometimes enjoy the sound and satisfaction which long words seem to bring. There is a story about one minister who simply loved the sound of โMesopotamiaโ and who said it on every possiยญble occasion. Our King James Version has sevยญeral lovely, many splendored, many syllabled words such as foreordination, predestination and lasciviousnessโto mention just a few.
I thought it might be not only amusing but seriously instructive if we could combine both these habits of mind and come up with a survey of seven multisyllabic-stated mistakes, or โspeaking faults,โ preachers or, I suppose, any public speaker can make.
The number with finality ย
None know in actuality, ย
Or complete factuality, ย
But, with some eccentricity ย
Though quite without duplicity, ย
Or any dark complicity, ย
We name them with insistency. ย
First on our list, which you should flee, ย
Is soft inaudibility; ย
A second horror one can see ย
Unintelligibility; ย
While third in terror, there would be, ย
All inapplicability. ย
Shun fourth, as youโd a poison tree, ย
Lank interminalibility; ย
Reject, fifth, is our earnest plea, ย
Inconsequentiality. ย
And sixth, quit โIโ and โmyโ and โme,โ ย
All proud egocentricity; ย
The seventh, almost all agree, ย
Is stiff inflexibility. ย
Watch out for these, dear preacher mine, And you can be my valentine! ย
* * *
Oh, well, Down, Iโm sure you and I prefer words that are brief, short, curt, terse, and small. However, quite early in the history of Christian discussion larger words did appear.
A man named Theophilus, who lived in Antiยญoch from 115โ181 A.D., wrote about how hard it is to picture God in these words: โIn glory He is incomprehensible, in greatness unfathomable, in height inconceivable, in power incomparable, in wisdom unrivalled, in goodness inimitable, in kindness unutterable.โ
With no ostentatious volubility, Iโm simply,
Yours, Thistle
_ _ _
READ MORE: โRevisiting Two โEpistles from Thistleโโ (March 14, 2019)ย


