Church Statistics: A Healthy Approach

April 12, 2018

Michael C. Mack

By Michael C. Mack How you view the statistics in this and the next two issues depends on the attitude you decide to take. I suppose you could look at the numbers with a competitive spirit, comparing your figures with those of a nearby church or one in your size category, with envy, suspicion, or … Read more

By Michael C. Mack

How you view the statistics in this and the next two issues depends on the attitude you decide to take.

I suppose you could look at the numbers with a competitive spirit, comparing your figures with those of a nearby church or one in your size category, with envy, suspicion, or snobbery. Some of us might do the same with churches of Bible college friends (and foes), churches where we used to work, or those hip, one-word-name churchesโ€”you know, like Vibe, Collage, 24|7, and TheUnpretentiousDeliberatelyIntentionalChurchofAuthenticRelevantChristianCommunity (โ€œUnpretentiousโ€ for short).

Iโ€™d like to suggest two healthier ways to look at the numbers.

What if we looked at the list of churchesโ€”and all our churchesโ€”as one big multisite church? In a way, this is a New Testament perspective. โ€œThere is one body and one Spirit,โ€ Paul said (Ephesians 4:4). โ€œThe church of Christ upon earth is essentially, intentionally, and constitutionally one,โ€ said Thomas Campbell in his Declaration and Address, โ€œconsisting of all those in every place that profess their faith in Christ and obedience to him in all things according to the Scriptures.โ€

What would it look like if we as Christโ€™s church took on the attitude of the Three Musketeers: โ€œAll for one and one for all, united we stand divided we fallโ€? I know; I have a wild imagination. But what if churches on the list, especially those in the same communities or regions, banded together and worked together to grow Godโ€™s church? What if they reached out to and served people in their communities, and carried out Godโ€™s mission, regardless of which church building they showed up at, whose membership they joined, or who got credit on an annual listing? Imagine a pastor telling a young couple that a neighboring church was the best fit for their family. Imagine a large church sending some of their people to a smaller, struggling church to help them carry out Godโ€™s mission there. Imagine small, medium, large and mega churches working together for Godโ€™s kingdom and his glory.

That is what we have in mind when we publish these lists of churches. (By the way, for the first time, we are including churches of all sizes in our reports this year! We start this month with megachurches and emerging megachurches. In June weโ€™ll report on large and medium churches, and in July weโ€™ll report on small and very small churches. For more information, see โ€œSpecial Church Report.โ€)

Another healthy way of looking at the churches on these lists is as a family of churches, a concept I gleaned from David Dummittโ€™s column.

In healthy families, parents raise their children with the goal of seeing them grow up and eventually leave home. The same should happen in healthy churches. In a healthy family, we celebrate each otherโ€™s wins and provide support and help in times of loss or failure. We should be doing the same with the churches who are part of our family treeโ€”all of them!

When attendance or baptisms rise at a church, itโ€™s my hope that other churches celebrate with them, even if their own numbers were not so good that year. The priority is always Christโ€™s church.

Like Ken Idleman (see his article about โ€œThe State of Our Christian Churches Todayโ€), I am optimistic about the future, but I also see areas we must improve. One such area concerns the struggling state of many of our ministers today, which Steve Reeves addresses in his article. I think youโ€™ll love reading our 10 โ€œSpotlightโ€ stories of churches across the country. Note that several of these churches have gone through major leadership transitions over the last two years. Youโ€™ll see different methods of transition but some common principles for transitioning well.

Christ does not have multiple brides. All the churches on our lists, and those who opted not to participate this year, are one church with one common purpose, serving together to bring glory to our one God. We are all better together than any of us can be alone.

Michael C. Mack
Author: Michael C. Mack

Michael C. Mack is editor of Christian Standard. He has served in churches in Ohio, Indiana, Idaho, and Kentucky. He has written more than 25 books and discussion guides as well as hundreds of magazine, newspaper, and web-based articles.

Sponsored

Renew University

Sponsored

Ozark Christian College Christian Standard 1200x1533

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Help Keep Christian Standard Free & Accessible with a Tax Deductible Donation

We can doย more together!

Every gift makes a difference!

No, thank you.
100% secure transactions - receipts provided.
Does Your Church Want to Support Christian Standard?

Would your church consider including support for Christian Standard in its annual missions budget? Your support would help us not only continue the 160-year legacy of this unifying ministry, but also expand the free resources, cooperative opportunities, and practical guidance we provide to strengthen churches in the U.S. and around the world.

We can doย more together!

Every gift makes a difference!

No, thank you.
100% secure transactions - receipts provided.
Secret Link
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x